To say that not one singular piece of art is wholly original may initially sound completely absurd and unlikely to an audience that is unfamiliar with How to Read Literature Like a Professor by Thomas C. Foster. Despite this concept seeming irrational, much more logic begins to form when one thoroughly ponders the idea of there being “nothing new under the sun.” Humanity’s imagination is limited to ideas, situations, objects, et cetera that have already been experienced or observed once before in the world. It is the evolution, addition, connection, and sharing of these that make not just art, but also technology, philosophy, and reason.
Foster describes this concept in literature as “one big story”. He is implying that all literature is formed from another piece of literature; Ian Fleming's James Bond series and Homer’s The Odyssey, Hemingway’s The Old Man and the Sea and The Holy Bible, and many other countless pieces of literature. At first thought, one might not see the connection between the two different yet very similar works of literature, the James Bond series and The Odyssey, but the connection reveals itself when the two texts are closely examined. Both James Bond and Odysseus rely on beguilement and stealth as their vehicle to success, both continually encounter a feminine distraction, and both are well-known masters of combat. Whether he paralleled Bond to Odysseus intentionally or not, Fleming still lacks originality in his writings just as every other author does because of the reliance of previous texts due to the limitation of man’s imagination.
With that being said, one might wonder which pieces of literature or art influenced Homer to create The Odyssey and The Iliad from. That would be the wrong question to ask, however - the more appropriate question would be what in general influenced him, not just what art influenced him. Homer didn’t necessarily concoct his duo of epics that has been apart of the human subconscious from just previous art, but he may have been influenced by nature and society -- the earliest section of the “big story,” -- such as many other contributors to the “big story,” have done. Albert Camus’s philosophical story of a man lacking emotion and motive, The Stranger, was influenced by his views of the “absurd” society that we live in and not directly from another piece of literature. Although The Stranger undoubtedly has been affected by previous literature at least in the slightest of ways, the basis of the story was formed from Camus’s perception of human nature. Camus’s use of his philosophy based on his observations of human nature write a new page into the “big story”. No Country for Old Men is a story that has been influenced heavily by The Stranger, and The Stranger was heavily influenced by how Camus perceived human nature.
Without even realizing it, humans are constantly surrounded by some of the most influential art. For instance, 70.6% of Americans are Christian. The Holy Bible is the basis of Christianity, and there are countless stories of Christ-like figures that go unnoticed by humanity. In Hemingway's The Old Man and The Sea, the main-character has qualities that would categorize him as a Christ-like figure, yet most of the audience is unaware of this parallel. Also The Holy Bible even influences the morals and decisions that a significant portion of the world makes. If someone that is amongst a large Christian community decides that he/she does not wish to indulge in the practices of "witchcraft", most likely it is because these practices are perceived negatively by the words of The Holy Bible. Without recognition by most humans, literature is embedded within everyone's lives, morals, and decisions and all of this has already been written into the "big story".
Every single piece of art is an excerpt from the “big story”. The “big story,” is a metaphorical composition of art and history that eternally records humanity and life and reconstructs it into the form of art. Each one of our ideas, thoughts, or emotions have already been written down in this, and artists are the ones who are able to access the story and present it to the world. What makes an artist great is not their originality, but their ability to delve deep within the “big story” of art and share their findings to whom unawarely created it, life.
Yea! It worked. More response later!!
ReplyDeleteMac
Dear Julian,
ReplyDeleteI am in love with the idea of the "one big story." I think it intersects with Archetypal Theory, Mythic Views, and Emerson's "Over-Soul." These things personally resonate with me. I too see many connections and intersections between movies, books, and art. You show here a level of reading that is impressive and insightful. I think you enjoy this web of connection too. I don't feel like this concept diminishes creativity in any way--which I don't think you do either. In fact, most often I imagine that these connections are primal, even serendipitous! It's almost like ideas are genetically coded. Artists don't always set out to allude and echo--it just organically happens. I am not even sure if the intention matters. I am also reminded of the ancient philosophy of art and creativity. It was always about emulation, resonation, and homage to what has always been. There is a human consistency and predictability that I find fascinating and maybe even reassuring.
Mac
Dear Julian,
ReplyDeleteYour comment about intention stuck with me. Sure, we can find connections in any piece of art. However, it begs the question of purpose. When I write creatively, I sometimes find myself unintentionally incorporating ideas from famed stories by writers like William Shakespeare or Emily Brontë. These allusions are not purposeful; they just occur when I write freely.
So, are these parallels more commonly purposeful or random? More often, I believe that the subtle interactions between texts are accidental. I do not think that the majority of writers sit down and plan to draw from another's work. In fact, I think that they hope to do just the opposite. We all want to be unique. We all want to write a revolutionary story that future authors draw from. However, the reality is that no idea is original. So, we must force ourselves to accept the idea of "one big story." Even though we can never be the original author, we can always be a contributor.
Madison
Julian, I really like what you said about the “big story.” I can buy into that concept, that every story can be derived from an original story, and just have a spin put on it. It’s like you mentioned with James Bond and The Odyssey; the basic storyline is the same, but the details differ to make each story more unique. However, I would argue that a lot of the concepts and points that stories over time use are fairly common. For example, the “damsel in distress” approach to a story has been used time and time again throughout history, and will continue to be used throughout literature, as it creates a compelling story. So many of the stories that we see from now to the end of time will be “copies” of stories before them, but are they really even copies? The base of the story can be the same, but the details will always differ, making each story unique.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDearest Julian, I believe you and I have had this discussion that you portray in your writing. This is actually very exciting that I can see my influence on you as an intellectual. It makes me feel smart so I’d like to begin my comment by thanking you. We talked about epic heroes like Jesus, Odysseus, and Achilles, and if you recall from Latin III last year we shared an online scholarly article on the parallels between recent and older heroes, specifically how James Bond is the modern-day Odysseus. I feel as though your blog as completed the full circle of this idea we had as juniors, but I hope in this upcoming year we can continue to entertain this thought process and share it with other. I also enjoyed in your writing your reference to No Country for Old Men which is a dope film and the Cohen Bros are incredible. Keep the Latin Encounters coming and I appreciate your intertextuality.
ReplyDelete